Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__spliced missing #263082

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__spliced missing #263082

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Oct 24, 2023

This should wait until after 23.11, but I'd like to try to merge it fairly promptly thereafter.

Right now when an unspliced package appears as a dependency, we just silently do the wrong thing, cross our fingers, and hope for the best. This is the reason why troubleshooting cross compilation is such a headache.

This PR adds a lib.warn for this situation when cross compiling. So we still do the wrong thing, but at least we tell the user that something is probably wrong. The warning will also cause CI to fail. I fixed about a dozen of these failures. The list-of-shame provides an escape hatch for urgent situations.

The list-of-shame currently has (about) two dozen of these splicing failures; these are ignored in order to get CI to pass. The idea is to get a check like this in place to prevent even more of these bugs from occurring while we work to eliminate the ones that are already there. Since lib.warn causes CI failures this will prevent people from introducing any more of these bugs (or else force them to add their stinky deeds to the list of shame).

  • CI passes
  • No mass rebuild (14 packages rebuilt, due to fixing splice failures)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 6.topic: stdenv Standard environment label Oct 24, 2023
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 24, 2023

Ping @Artturin @alyssais

Proof that we are not splicing Rust hooks: check out this PR, then run:

nix-instantiate . -A pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.fd

in the output you'll see:

trace: warning: derivation fd:
                     unspliced dependency /nix/store/99jm62fd7xh1yzjys0z3r70d1vvra51r-cargo-build-hook.sh
                       build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
                       target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

trace: warning: derivation fd:
                     unspliced dependency /nix/store/84aap5fr5s6yblga5w6fbx71j21l591a-cargo-check-hook.sh
                       build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
                       target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

trace: warning: derivation fd:
                     unspliced dependency /nix/store/0796vgahxgg8n7w1gr2pdb9sd3kibk13-cargo-install-hook.sh
                       build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
                       target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

trace: warning: derivation fd:
                     unspliced dependency /nix/store/qppx46087vy5xx8j3jajbzbqsjhvcp2b-cargo-setup-hook.sh
                       build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
                       target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

@ghost ghost changed the title [WIP] make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__splice is missing when expected [WIP] make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__splice is missing Oct 24, 2023
@ghost ghost changed the title [WIP] make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__splice is missing [WIP] make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__splice missing Oct 24, 2023
@Artturin
Copy link
Member

Is similar to #204387

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 24, 2023

Is similar to #204387

Well, I think they're sort of orthogonal (and both are a good idea). It looks like checkExecutableOnBuild always succeeds when the __spliced attribute is missing even if it should be there -- whereas the point of this PR is to emit a warning in exactly that situation. Currently it takes way too long to figure out if a problem is caused by splicing not happening.

You should merge yours first since mine isn't done and is easier to rebase.

@Artturin
Copy link
Member

Befofe merge there should be a way to fix the warning.

We should find out a way to splice or work around the lack of splicing when a function that returns derivation(s) is used (without adding it to be reachable from top-level).

Maybe a callPackage like func which internally calls with the various sets callPackage's, but a issue would still be what the user passes if it was not already spliced (eg overrideAttrs was used).

always succeeds when the __spliced attribute is missing even if it should be there

Explicitly used sets like buildPackages won't have a __spliced in packages

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 24, 2023

We should find out a way to splice or work around the lack of splicing when a function that returns derivation(s) is used (without adding it to be reachable from top-level).

The way to do that is to have all derivations be spliced, always, all the time. Then we don't have to worry about it.

In other words, do the splicing in mkDerivation.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 25, 2023

Explicitly used sets like buildPackages won't have a __spliced in packages

I think that's the point. Those should never be used in depsFooBar.

They should only be used when you need to interpolate into a string, like "${buildPlatform.lndir} ..."

@ghost

This comment was marked as resolved.

Comment on lines +32 to +36
# shame on you, llvm!
"llvm"
"compiler-rt"
"libcxx"
"libcxxabi"
Copy link
Member

@Artturin Artturin Oct 25, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the llvm sets use the normal makeScope and that's why there's no __spliced's in the sets own callPackage

I'm little by little working on making the sets better #253671
once I dedupe more stuff it'll be much easier to dedupe and improve the llvm/*/default.nix'es

Nice list name.

@ghost

This comment was marked as outdated.

@ghost ghost changed the title [WIP] make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__splice missing make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__splice missing Oct 25, 2023
@ghost

This comment was marked as outdated.

@@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
hash = "sha256-yosEmjwtOyIloejRXWE3mOvHSOOVA4jtomlN5Qe6YCA=";
};

nativeBuildInputs = lib.optional (stdenv.hostPlatform != stdenv.buildPlatform) buildPackages.cracklib;
nativeBuildInputs = lib.optional (stdenv.hostPlatform != stdenv.buildPlatform) cracklib;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am trying to get more fit in cross: Shouldn't this use canExecute?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is what you mean, then yes, that would be an improvement (let's put it in a separate PR though -- one thing at a time).

diff --git a/pkgs/development/libraries/cracklib/default.nix b/pkgs/development/libraries/cracklib/default.nix
index ba5d96a95182..defdb2965173 100644
--- a/pkgs/development/libraries/cracklib/default.nix
+++ b/pkgs/development/libraries/cracklib/default.nix
@@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
     hash = "sha256-yosEmjwtOyIloejRXWE3mOvHSOOVA4jtomlN5Qe6YCA=";
   };

-  nativeBuildInputs = lib.optional (stdenv.hostPlatform != stdenv.buildPlatform) buildPackages.cracklib;
+  nativeBuildInputs = lib.optional (!stdenv.buildPlatform.canExecute stdenv.hostPlatform) buildPackages.cracklib;
   buildInputs = [ zlib gettext ];

-  postPatch = lib.optionalString (stdenv.hostPlatform == stdenv.buildPlatform) ''
+  postPatch = lib.optionalString (stdenv.buildPlatform.canExecute stdenv.hostPlatform) ''
     chmod +x util/cracklib-format
     patchShebangs util

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This goes against your comment below about using buildPackages in nativeBuildInputs.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This goes against your comment below about using buildPackages in nativeBuildInputs.

Indeed! Nice catch. If this PR were merged CI would have caught that.

The patch above should, in addition to the changes it makes, also delete the buildPackages. before cracklib.

@ghost ghost changed the title make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__splice missing make-derivation.nix: lib.warn if drv.__spliced missing Oct 26, 2023
@ofborg ofborg bot added 8.has: clean-up 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package labels Oct 26, 2023
kjeremy added a commit to kjeremy/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2023
Fixes warnings with NixOS#263082 applied

Update pkgs/development/libraries/ncurses/default.nix

Co-authored-by: Artturi <Artturin@artturin.com>

ncurses: Explicitly use buildPackages for --with-build-cc

stdenv.cc worked for me because my nixos was configured to use boot.binfmt.emulatedSystems.
kjeremy added a commit to kjeremy/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2023
Fixes warnings with NixOS#263082 applied

Update pkgs/development/libraries/ncurses/default.nix

Co-authored-by: Artturi <Artturin@artturin.com>

ncurses: Explicitly use buildPackages for --with-build-cc

stdenv.cc worked for me because my nixos was configured to use boot.binfmt.emulatedSystems.
@kjeremy kjeremy mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2023
13 tasks
Adam Joseph and others added 11 commits November 17, 2023 03:01
In order to avoid setting off the unspliced-dependency check, we
need to make sure that the targetPackages.stdenv.cc.bintools used by
gcc gets spliced.  In order for it to be spliced, it needs a
top-level entry in all-packages.nix.  Therefore, this commit adds one.

This also causes us to stop abusing targetPackages to access the
linker, which is a good thing.
This commit adds a `lib.warn` check to stdenv.mkDerivation, causing
it to emit a warning if a dependency which ought to be spliced in
fact is not.
Co-authored-by: Artturi <Artturin@artturin.com>
…s in buildInputs"

This reverts commit 0899b6b8746790eec9dc49ea4f4a6c3def072e3b.
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 17, 2023

Fixed merge conflict.

@kjeremy
Copy link
Contributor

kjeremy commented Nov 28, 2023

@amjoseph-nixpkgs can we merge this soon?

@kjeremy
Copy link
Contributor

kjeremy commented Dec 7, 2023

@amjoseph-nixpkgs What do you think about merging this so that it forces the issue of fixing packages for cross? I would personally like it so that I can hunt down the cross issues in all of my out of tree packages.

@kjeremy
Copy link
Contributor

kjeremy commented Jan 8, 2024

@amjoseph-nixpkgs 23.11 branched off a while ago. Can we merge this?

@ghost ghost closed this Jan 23, 2024
@ghost ghost deleted the pr/stdenv/warn-missing-splices branch January 23, 2024 06:50
@kjeremy
Copy link
Contributor

kjeremy commented Jan 23, 2024

@amjoseph-nixpkgs why close this? I found this useful when trying to figure out why some of my cross pkgs were broken.

@katexochen
Copy link
Contributor

katexochen commented Jan 23, 2024

@kjeremy I think this PR was closed in in the light of #50105 (comment). While not necessary, Adam chose to closed some of their open PRs (which is of cause okay if they like to do so).

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants